Agricultural robots can help improve biodiversity

Small, autonomous robots will make it possible to grow several different crops on the same field and that can help improve biodiversity. Illustration: Mark Airs.

Small, autonomous robots will make it possible to grow several different crops on the same field and that can help improve biodiversity. Illustration: Mark Airs.

In Denmark, agriculture makes up almost 2/3 of our land and oftentimes one crop is grown in huge areas. That's hurting the biodiversity, but agricultural robots can help do away with monoculture, and a new DTU project will pave the way for that future.

This article was first published on

www.dtu.dk

This article was discussed in our Next Byte podcast


The full article will continue below.


When Lazaros Nalpantidis sees a field, he imagines a future where a fleet of small robots chugs along, tending and caring for the crops on their own. Each machine has its own task—they sow, remove weeds, check for pests, water, spray pesticides and harvest. And the fields look different. There are no endless rows of wheat, barley, and corn, but instead many different crops—and the surroundings are buzzing with life.

Shaped after machines

If we want to improve biodiversity, we must change our agriculture. In Denmark, agriculture takes up over 60% of our land and the vast majority of the fields are monoculture, where a single crop dominates large areas. This creates bad conditions for biodiversity. But what if robots could change that?

"We have shaped the environment to our agricultural machines. But with robotic technology, we can shape the machines to the environment," says Lazaros Nalpantidis.

He is a professor at DTU Electro and is heading the project SAVA (Safe Autonomous Vehicles for Agriculture), which will develop safe agricultural robots that can work autonomously in much smaller areas than large agricultural machines. That can create fertile ground for a paradigm shift in agriculture and bring an end to monoculture while still maintaining efficiency and yield.

Monoculture is bad news for biodiversity

Before industrialization, it was common for farmers to grow several different crops on the same field. But as machines took over manual labour, it became more widespread to grow the same crop on large areas, as it made it easier to plough, fertilize and harvest using large machines.

"Back in the day, it was necessary to have a versatile farm with crop diversity to meet local needs, but after World War II the specialization of agriculture began to take hold. That made economies of scale and monoculture possible," says Ane Kirstine Aare.  

She’s assistant professor at the Department of People and Technology at RUC and has done research on transition towards more sustainable agriculture practices such as co-cultivation, where multiple crops are grown on the same field.

Agriculture became more efficient, but monoculture is bad news for biodiversity. In nature, there are many different plants that bloom at different times of the year and a diverse cover of trees, shrubs, grass and herbs that create habitats for a number of animal species and all that disappears when the fields are uniform.

At the same time, it also increases the risk that the entire field will be affected by pests and diseases and thus the need for using pesticides also increases, which is hurting biodiversity.

"The problem is that we’ve developed a food system that has been shaped to fit monocultural practices. Most involved parties in the food system have adapted to this practice, so it’s difficult to change course," says Ane Kirstine Aare.

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the UN has concluded in a report that monoculture in agriculture leads to less plant diversity and thus fewer ecosystem services. There are fewer pollinators like bees, pests have fewer natural enemies, there are fewer microorganisms in the soil and fewer wild species of crops. The FAO points out that one of the solutions is technology that can have a positive effect on biodiversity - and this is where robots come into play.

All sensors on the table

Robotic technology is slowly making its way into agriculture – there are already robots that can remove weeds (including the Galirumi robot where DTU was involved), spray with pesticide, and harvest certain crops. The development is making rapid headway, but there are still very few agricultural robots on the market. According to Statistics Denmark, only 1% of Danish farms use self-driving machines or robotic technology, and the technology has not yet matured enough for the robots to run fully autonomously, so it’s mandatory that a person supervises them.

"If the farmer has to stay with the robot, you’re not gaining much from it," says Lazaros Nalpantidis.

The problem is that the robots are still not capable of handling unforeseen obstacles such as people, animals, and rocks, but the SAVA project aims to solve that. Lazaros Nalpantidis and his colleagues will test a range of new sensor technologies that will increase safety so that the robots can be fully unleashed in the fields.

"We have to put all the toys on the table and see if it opens up some new possibilities," says Lazaros Nalpantidis.

The SAVA project will test safety systems in different areas such as grass fields, parks, fruit orchards, and vineyards. This will happen in collaboration with various companies creating agricultural machines. Photo: AGCO

More biological cameras

Today, robots and self-driving machines mainly use cameras and Lidar, a laser technology that can measure distances, but the SAVA project will also test infrared cameras and thermal cameras that can better detect animals and people in the surroundings.

In addition, the project will test so-called neuromorphic cameras (also known as event-based cameras), which function more like our eyes and only register when something changes in the image, rather than constantly registering everything in the image. Whereas the best DSLR cameras can capture around 120 frames per second, a neuromorphic camera can take up to 1,000,000 frames per second. Lazaros Nalpantidis hopes that this kind of technology can help the robots react significantly faster to unforeseen obstacles and come to a stop if, for instance, an animal or a person suddenly runs in front of them (in Denmark, approx. 20,000 deer fawns are killed by agricultural machines every year, according to Denmark's Hunters' Association).

Agricultural paradigm shift

Robots can fundamentally change the appearance of our fields. As agricultural robots tend to be significantly smaller than traditional agricultural machines, they can be adapted to a smaller area without sacrificing efficiency.

This means that you can plant narrow strips of several different crops next to each other, as the robots can sow, water, spray, and harvest in a narrow area.

Studies show that if you grow several different crops in an area, it’s better for biodiversity, as it provides habitats for more species, while there is less need for fertilizing and spraying with pesticides. If a crop is affected by pests or disease, it is limited to a single strip rather than an entire field.

In the long term, the robots can help change the entire landscape. In many places, the fields are moulded to the needs of large agricultural machines – streams are straightened out, low-lying areas drained, and hills leveled – but small robots will be able to follow nature’s shapes to a greater extent. Thus, more habitats for animals and plants can be preserved.

Robots within ten years

To get to that vision, the robots must first prove that they can operate safely and autonomously and not be of danger to their surroundings.

"Unfortunately, the robotic technology is not quite mature enough yet," says Lazaros Nalpantidis.

He acknowledges that robots are only a small part of the solution to the biodiversity crisis – and there will still be a need for large agricultural machines – but he hopes that robots can help make changes in parts of the world where industrial agriculture has not yet gained traction.

Ane Kirstine Aare also sees potential in robots.

"Some experience limitations with current agricultural machines when they wish to practice co-cultivation, so it’s really exciting to see what the robots can contribute. If robots are developed thoughtfully they may pave the way for a different kind of agriculture with more flexibility and local adaptation," she says.

To Lazaros Nalpantidis, his vision of robots chugging around in the fields might become reality within ten years.

"I am quite optimistic because there is momentum in this area and it is clear that we cannot continue with the current agricultural production. It’s just not sustainable," says Lazaros Nalpantidis.

"But in ten years’ time, we’ll have far more futuristic machines in agriculture."

For almost two centuries DTU, Technical University of Denmark, has been dedicated to fulfilling the vision of H.C. Ørsted—the father of electromagnetism—who founded the university in 1829 to develop and create value using the natural sciences and the technical sciences to benefit society. DTU is a ...